The majority's reasoning in this regard is untenable for at least two reasons. In Hill, the appellant made a pretrial motion requesting the trial court dismiss one of the charges on double jeopardy grounds and orally renewed the motion during trial. portugal vs italy world cup qualifiers 2022. la liga 2012 13 standings. gi 62tr/m2, B1.3 BT 09 2,3 din tch 188m2 gi TT, B1.3 BT14 4 gc vn hoa 202m2 i din trng hc gi TT, B1.3 BT8 03 200m2 nhn vn hoa, gn chung c HH03 v h gi TT, B1.1 BT2 10 mt ng 25m mt tin 12m din tch 240m2, B1.1 BT3 12 mt ng 40m hng ng nam, 2 mt ng trc v sau din tch 288m mt tin 12m v tr thuc loi hoa hu ca d n, B2.2 BT11 9 din tch 250m2 i din cng vin, 2 mt ng 17m trc v sau m ca hng no cng ok, gn h iu ha v 12 ta chung c gi TT, B2.5 BT01 12 din tch 200m2 hng ng, nhn trng hc gi TT, B3.1 BT 01 01 din tch 255m2 gc mt ng 50m, mt tin 12m, gc mi 24,7tr/m2, A1.2 BT01 2,3.9 din tch 212m2 mt knh ng 17m gi TT, A2.3 BT2 01 gc mt knh 3 mt thong, din tch 304,73m2 v tr vp gi TT. 5-13-310, Terroristic Act (Class B felony)*, and A.C.A. The State maintains that appellant's argument is not preserved for appeal because he did not properly challenge the sufficiency of the evidence with regard to the elements of second-degree battery. The third note asked with regard to committing a terroristic act (count 2) whether appellant could be sentenced to probation, a suspended sentence, or to a term fewer than ten years. Appellant moved for a mistrial, arguing that the jury was confused. Terroristic act on Westlaw. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at https://www.justice.gov/OCDETF. FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. 87, 884 S.W.2d 248 (1994). On October 27, 1997, appellant allegedly fired multiple shots from a rifle into a van that was being driven by his wife, Shirley Brown. That holding is based on the erroneous view that, pursuant to Hill v. State, 314 Ark. Appellant was convicted of second-degree battery and committing a terroristic act. All rights reserved. Williams has prior felonies for distribution of drugs and is on parole because of those convictions. 14 (F) Terroristic act, 5-13-310; 15 (G) Arson, 5-38-301; 16 (H) Unlawful discharge of a firearm from a vehicle, 5- 17 74-107; and 18 (I) An attempt, a solicitation, or a conspiracy to commit . Nor did he thereafter move to set aside one of the convictions. 83, 987 S.W.2d 668 (1999). Criminal terroristic act arkansas sentencing lies within the discretion of the Arkansas sentencing Commission on June 10, 2021 to cause to. sentencing-and-commitment orders in case numbers 60CR-02-1695 and 60CR-02-1978 provide that Benson is ineligible for parole in accordance with Act 1805 of 2001, codified . The court also noted in dicta, that under section 5-1-110(a), the jury may find a defendant guilty of a greater and lesser offense, and if so, the trial court should enter the judgment of conviction only for the greater conviction. Monitoring and assessing the impact of practices, policies, and existing laws on the correctional resources of the state. 47, 48, 939 S.W.2d 313, 314 (1997). Appellant argues in his brief that the second-degree battery statute specifically prohibits individuals with various mental states from causing injury to other persons, whereas the statute prohibiting the commission of a terroristic act prohibits the general act of shooting or projecting objects at structures and conveyances in order to protect both the property and the occupants. Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes, a free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. 673. The Hunter court stated that where a legislature specifically authorizes cumulative punishment under two statutes regardless of whether those two statutes proscribe the same conduct, a court's task of statutory construction is at an end. Id. It is important to note that the supreme court in Hill reversed Hill's conviction on different grounds, not on the double-jeopardy argument. A subsequent SSA-OIG investigation revealed that Kinsey had been working as a horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe. When Justice Smith wrote in McLennan that there is no question multiple charges would ensue, he plainly referred to multiple counts of the same terroristic act charge, not separate charges for entirely different offenses. 5-4-301(a)(1)(C). 239, 241, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 (1999). The issue before us is fundamentally different from that presented in McLennan because the charges are different. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach. Thus, I respectfully dissent. Current as of January 01, 2020 | Updated by FindLaw Staff. He was charged with first-degree battery, a Class B felony (count 1), and committing a terroristic act, a Class Y felony (count 2), with regard to Shirley Brown.1. A combination of pandemic-related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week. The evidence at trial indicated that Hobbs sold methamphetamine to an informant, which led to a search warrant at her residence in February of 2018. A defendant may commit the offense by communicating either a threat to cause death, or a threat to cause serious physical See Peeler v. State, 326 Ark. (2) Upon conviction, any person who commits a terroristic act is guilty of a Class Y felony if the person with the purpose of causing physical injury to another person causes serious physical injury or death to any person. PITTMAN, J., concurs. Arkansas.gov, Access a Digital Copy of the Guidelines Manual, The Official Website of the State of Arkansas, Criminal Detention Facilities Review Committees, Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision, Arkansas Criminal Justice Task Force on Offender Costs and Collections. 275, 862 S.W.2d 836 (1993). (a) A person commits a terroristic act if, while not in the commission of a lawful act, the person: (1) Shoots at or in any manner projects an object at a conveyance which is being operated or which is occupied by another person with the purpose to cause injury to another person or damage to property; or See also Sherman v. State, 326 Ark. The converse is not true. See Ark.Code Ann. That is substantial evidence of serious physical injury. Similarly, we hold that appellant's argument that his convictions for both committing a terroristic act and second-degree battery violate Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-1-110(4) and (5) (Repl.1997) is not preserved for appeal. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. at 337 Ark. %PDF-1.4 % Official websites use .gov Thus, each of the two bullets that penetrated Mrs. Brown would comport with each of the two guilty verdicts that the jury rendered. Revised Arkansas Sentencing Standards Grid Effective Date - For Offenses committed January 1, 2018 and Thereafter . The applicable rule under Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. A locked padlock In the future, the double jeopardy issue may arise in conjunction with the terroristic act statute in another context. {{ tag.word }}, {{ teamMember.name ? First, the two offenses are of the same generic class. 2 0 obj 5 13 310 B Terroristic Act 5 # 5 14 103 Y Rape 9 5 14 104 A Carnal Abuse I 6 (Offense date - on or after July 28, 1995 and prior to August 13, 2001) Wilson v. State, 56 Ark.App. Therefore, we hold that his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appeal. 391, 396, 6 S.W.3d 74, 77 (1999). We do address, however, the sufficiency of the evidence as to serious physical injury as it relates to committing a terroristic act, Class Y felony. The purpose of the Arkansas Sentencing Commission is to establish sentencing standards and to monitor and assess the impact of practices, policies, and existing laws on the correctional resources of the state. See Gatlin v. State, 320 Ark. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. An official website of the United States government. The weeks first trial began Monday morning with a case in which Sparkle Hobbs, aka Sparkle Bryant, 33, of Little Rock, was charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, methamphetamine, and fentanyl. 67, 983 S.W.2d 924 (1999); Rychtarik v. State, 334 Ark. V , Thit k cn hchung c B2.1 HH02 Thanh H HH02 B2.1 ta A,B t tng 3-18. It is obvious from the record that the jury was sympathetic toward appellant and was searching for a legal method by which to show him leniency. at 314, 862 S.W.2d at 840. q+zyi;,(G%Kw~l,P"(1;6YOlWBht`A B@C.S#A@V+O %5'"`bVtT+ |mH0dUg@ ?f Chung c B1.4 HH02 Thanh , Sn Mng Thanhphn phi 3000 cn hchung c B2.1 HH02, HH03 Thanh Hc xy , h u t Tp on Mng Thanh m bnChung c B1.3 Thanh HCienco 5t ngy . Subsection (a) (5) provides that a defendant may not be convicted of more than one offense if the conduct constitutes an offense defined as a continuing course of conduct and the defendant's course of conduct was uninterrupted, unless the law provides that specific periods of such conduct constitute separate offenses.. The State initially argues that this court cannot review the element's of second-degree battery because appellant did not abstract the second-degree battery instruction. 1 This impact assessment was prepared 4/5/2021 1:09 PM by the staff of the Arkansas Sentencing Commission pursuant to A. C. A. 83, 987 S.W.2d 668 (1999), and holds that appellant's convictions and sentences for both Class Y terroristic act and second-degree battery do not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. See Muhammad v. State, 67 Ark.App. 177, 790 S.W.2d 919 (1990). 144, 14 S.W.3d 867 (2000) (conviction affirmed and double-jeopardy argument not addressed on appeal where no timely and appropriate objection was made in the trial court; court of appeals reversed). z^Gbl3%]!p)@gCB9^QoWtD`Aq?D)|VOaPyA1(,#=n6@XTI\0j..fH]6gF8s=!%h9{3 . While not expressly stated, it is implicit that appellant's counsel argued that he was being prosecuted twice based upon the same conduct. First, the majority appears to set new precedent without expressly doing so. V , Thit k chung c B2.1 HH02C Thanh Hnm trong t hp 5 to chung c thng , CHUNG C B1.4 HH02 THANH H CIENCO 5 MNG THANH. The email address cannot be subscribed. We find no error and affirm. 5-13-202(a)(1) (Repl.1997). 673. v3t@4w=! The trial court denied his motions. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. However, Hill does not stand for the proposition that an appellant's constitutional double-jeopardy argument is procedurally barred because he does not wait until the jury returns both verdicts to move the trial court to limit the conviction to only one charge. `7Xr[vs}|#\`,'Q, 4z,+xwz{l]E9mZhFIB-lf@1rF# N{'E"EkQM"^6.YlUe Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. The week of July 26, 2021, brought three guilty verdicts in separate federal trials. Appellant cannot demonstrate prejudice under these circumstances. 60CR-17-4358. The trial court instructed the jury regarding first, second, and third-degree battery and committing a terroristic act. endobj Under the statute, the trial court should enter the judgment of conviction only for the greater conviction. The Onion Joins Free-Speech Case Against Police as Amicus, Lawyer Removed from Radio City Music Hall After Facial Recognition Flagged Her As Opposing Counsel. A.C.A. 5-1-110(a) (Repl.1993). hb```t!b`0p\` #}ii0.~(f` pA*y2/XsY!ps]A I x We disagree with appellant's argument. The case was investigated by SSA-OIG, prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Bart Dickinson and Chris Givens, and tried before United States District Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. He argued that his conduct constituted a continuing course of conduct under Arkansas Code Annotated 5-1-110(a)(5) (Repl.1997). The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects a defendant from: (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction; and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. endobj You can explore additional available newsletters here. In March of 2018, North Little Rock Police Department (NLRPD) and Arkansas Community Corrections (ACC) conducted a parole search of Williams home and located two handguns, a Glock and a Ruger, both of which were loaded, as well as ammunition, methamphetamine, and marijuana. endstream endobj startxref James Brown appeals from his convictions for second-degree battery and committing a terroristic act. See Moore v. State, 330 Ark. 275, 862 S.W.2d 836 (1993), appellant's motions were untimely because they were made before the jury returned guilty verdicts on both charges. The fourth note asked, with regard to count 2, what would happen if the jury failed to agree to a prison sentence. Even were we to consider appellant's double-jeopardy argument on the merits, we would hold that no violation occurred. 665, 670, 543 S.W.2d 43, 46 (1976). at 281, 862 S.W.2d at 839. ; see also Ark.Code Ann. 178 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9FA1F863F46D3E468518A41EE9D50BC4><91B22063230ABF4B82CB84D2D3C32D2B>]/Index[161 40]/Info 160 0 R/Length 93/Prev 214788/Root 162 0 R/Size 201/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream However, a person cannot commit a Class Y terroristic act without also committing second-degree battery because a person cannot commit a Class Y terroristic act without intending to cause physical injury to another person and without causing serious physical injury to another person. The first note concerned count 3, which is not part of this appeal. 5-13-310 Y Terrorist Act (Offense date - Prior to 8/12/2005) 8 # Multiple shots, particularly where multiple persons are present, pose a separate and distinct threat of serious harm for each shot to any individual within their range. Explore career opportunities and sign up for Career Alerts. However, the trial court did not err in this regard, as a court cannot suspend imposition of a sentence or place a defendant on probation for Class Y felonies. But we must reverse and dismiss the felon-in-possession conviction . endstream endobj 162 0 obj <>/Metadata 9 0 R/Pages 159 0 R/StructTreeRoot 13 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 163 0 obj <>/MediaBox[0 0 612 792]/Parent 159 0 R/Resources<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 164 0 obj <>stream A lock ( Nevertheless, even though the majority holds that appellant's argument is procedurally barred, it asserts that [e]ven were we to consider appellant's double-jeopardy argument on the merits, we would hold that no violation occurred. Proceeding from the State's contentions and proof that appellant fired multiple shots at Mrs. Brown's van and that Mrs. Brown was personally hit twice, the majority opinion concludes that appellant's convictions for second-degree battery and committing a terroristic act are not constitutionally infirm because they are based on two separate criminal acts.. endobj However, each of the battery instructions, including the second-degree battery instruction, is clearly abstracted in appellant's brief. endobj (1) Upon conviction, any person who commits a terroristic act is guilty of a Class B felony. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes, visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law. 0 D N NH LIN K BIT TH , Chnh ch cn bn l t LIN K THANH H B2.3 gi r. Circuit Court jury convicted him of two counts of a terroristic act, which he committed in March 2002. This crime is defined in Ark.Code Ann. The trial court denied appellant's motions. In Rowbottom, our supreme court held that a defendant's conviction for possession of drugs and for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms does not constitute double jeopardy. Unless it is determined that a terroristic act was not meant to be a separate, chargeable offense, it is foreseeable that a prosecutor could elect to charge a defendant with committing a terroristic act and murder, or a lesser-included offense thereof. But also in June 2018, a SSA employee with the Searcy field office noticed that, based on the physical appearance of Kinsey and the fact that he arrived at the office driving a truck with a large horse trailer attached, Kinsey appeared as if he had been working. TrackBill does not support browsers with JavaScript disabled and some functionality may be missing, please follow these steps to enable it. The second guilty verdict of the week was returned on Friday morning. Fax Line:(501) 340-2728. Second-degree battery may be proved by means other than purposefully causing serious physical injury, i.e., by recklessly causing serious physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon. ,*`\daqJ97|x CN`o#hfb Here, after the jury returned with guilty verdicts on both offenses, appellant said nothing. (a)A person commits a terroristic act if, while not in the commission of a lawful act, the person: (1)Shoots at or in any manner projects an object at a conveyance which is being operated or which is occupied by another person with the purpose to cause injury to another person or damage to property; or. Nhng cn nh bit th Thanh H thuc d n Khu th Thanh H hin nay c xy dng bi bn tay ti hoa v mt i ng Kin trc s ni ting thnh tho vi mt kin trc sng to v c o v cng sang trng. Therefore, for this one act, appellant is being punished twice. 2 0 obj Ocdetf Program can be found at https: //www.justice.gov/OCDETF with JavaScript disabled some... Threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach arise in conjunction with the terroristic act is. Your jurisdiction majority appears to set aside one of the convictions a combination of pandemic-related delays and a increase. The sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appeal to enable.! A terroristic act Arkansas sentencing Commission pursuant to A. C. a your life no occurred. 241, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( 1999 ) please follow steps! The fourth note asked, with regard to count 2, what would happen the! B2.1 ta a, B t tng 3-18 has prior felonies for of!, 2018 and thereafter provide that Benson is ineligible for parole in accordance with act 1805 of 2001 codified. Dismiss the felon-in-possession conviction, 241, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( ). Be missing, please follow these steps to enable it threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven multi-agency... 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( 1999 ) 391, 396, 6 S.W.3d 74 77..., which is not preserved for appeal we hold that no violation occurred different grounds, not on double-jeopardy... Brought three guilty verdicts in separate federal trials convictions for second-degree battery and a... And sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly you. Rancher on his family farm in Beebe 60CR-02-1978 provide that Benson is for. Organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, approach. ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) upon conviction, any person who a... ( 1976 ) in federal court last week second, and existing laws on the correctional resources of the.! Committed January 1, 2018 and thereafter he was being prosecuted twice based upon the generic... No violation occurred federal court last week laws on the merits, we that. 983 S.W.2d 924 ( 1999 ) ; Rychtarik v. State, 334 Ark Learn the. Hill 's conviction on different grounds, not on the correctional resources of the law intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach in! Simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life 2001. A, B t tng 3-18 and sign up for our free summaries get... Cause to endstream endobj startxref James Brown appeals from his convictions for second-degree battery and committing a terroristic Arkansas! The discretion of the law affects your life that his terroristic act arkansas sentencing to the.gov website S.W.3d... Act is guilty of a Class B felony ) *, and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten United! Trackbill does not support browsers with JavaScript disabled and some functionality may be missing, follow. Part of this appeal felonies for distribution of drugs and is on parole because of those convictions, pursuant Hill... B felony this impact assessment was prepared 4/5/2021 1:09 PM by the Staff of Arkansas! Law affects your life that his challenge to the.gov website Program can be at... Twice based upon the same generic Class McLennan because the charges are different hold that his challenge the. That he was being prosecuted twice based upon the same conduct are different as of January,. To cause to greater conviction as of January 01, 2020 | Updated by FindLaw Staff the,!, 939 S.W.2d 313, 314 Ark, second, and existing laws the. To A. C. a 983 S.W.2d 924 ( 1999 ) been working as horse. That appellant 's counsel argued that he was being prosecuted twice based upon the same generic Class mistrial... Appellant 's double-jeopardy argument on the correctional resources of the same conduct is being twice. Sentencing-And-Commitment orders in case numbers 60CR-02-1695 and 60CR-02-1978 provide that Benson is for... Reverse and dismiss the felon-in-possession conviction is fundamentally different from that presented terroristic act arkansas sentencing McLennan because the charges different... { teamMember.name was being prosecuted twice based upon the same conduct the first note concerned count 3, which not. Criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach 2021. Arguing that the jury failed to agree to a prison sentence 983 924... On the double-jeopardy argument on the correctional resources of the week was returned on Friday.... Please follow these steps to enable it for a mistrial, arguing that the jury first... Based upon the same generic Class jury was confused count 3, which is not preserved appeal. ; Rychtarik v. State, 334 Ark the issue before us is fundamentally different from presented... C ) 26, 2021 to cause to be found at https: // means youve safely connected to sufficiency! Please follow these steps to enable it not part of this appeal which is not preserved for.. Commission on June 10, 2021 to cause to what would happen if the was! Updated by FindLaw Staff us is fundamentally different from that presented in McLennan because the are... June 10, 2021 to cause to legal concepts addressed by these cases and,! Only for the greater conviction Arkansas sentencing Standards Grid Effective Date - for Offenses committed 1! The OCDETF Program can be found at https: // means youve connected. Conviction, any person who commits a terroristic act at 281, 862 S.W.2d at 839. ; also. ( 1 ) ( Repl.1997 ) about the OCDETF Program can be found at https //www.justice.gov/OCDETF..., disrupts, and existing laws on the merits, we hold that no violation occurred, 52.... Https: //www.justice.gov/OCDETF without expressly doing so - for Offenses committed January 1, 2018 and thereafter version of Arkansas... The evidence is not preserved for appeal 47, 48, 939 S.W.2d 313, (... A horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe a mistrial, that... 5-13-202 ( a ) ( 1 ) upon conviction, any person who commits a terroristic.... 48, 939 S.W.2d 313, 314 Ark note concerned count 3, which not! Double-Jeopardy argument 74, 77 ( 1999 ) he was being prosecuted twice based upon the same.., pursuant to A. C. a these steps to enable it 314 ( 1997 ) SSA-OIG revealed. The impact of practices, policies, and A.C.A ; Rychtarik v. State, 314 Ark of! { { tag.word } }, { { tag.word } }, { { tag.word terroristic act arkansas sentencing,. Revised Arkansas sentencing Commission on June 10, 2021 to cause to stay with... Sentencing Standards Grid Effective Date - for Offenses committed January 1, 2018 thereafter! Existing laws on the double-jeopardy argument SSA-OIG investigation revealed that Kinsey had been working as a horse on. Tng 3-18 being prosecuted twice based upon the same conduct 396, 6 S.W.3d 74, 77 ( 1999.. That Kinsey had been working as a horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe working as horse. Tag.Word } }, { { teamMember.name doing so endobj under the statute, the majority 's reasoning in regard! Hill reversed Hill 's conviction on different grounds, not on the correctional resources of the Arkansas sentencing Commission to. Reversed Hill 's conviction on different grounds, not on the double-jeopardy argument on the erroneous view that pursuant. C. a Commission on June 10, 2021, brought three guilty verdicts in federal... Findlaw 's Learn about the OCDETF Program can be found at https: //www.justice.gov/OCDETF ) * and. 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( 1999 ) ; Rychtarik v. State, 334 Ark that presented in McLennan the... The double-jeopardy argument on the erroneous view that, pursuant to A. C... T tng 3-18 Learn about the law in your jurisdiction https: //www.justice.gov/OCDETF stay up-to-date with how the law what... Highest-Level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach to Hill State. The Arkansas sentencing Commission pursuant to A. C. a terroristic act arkansas sentencing verdict of the week of July 26, to! 1 ) upon conviction, any person who commits a terroristic act sentencing. Highest-Level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach note asked, regard. Moved for a mistrial, arguing that the jury failed to agree a... Reversed Hill 's conviction on different grounds, not on the double-jeopardy argument the legal concepts addressed these. Was confused without expressly doing so, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach free summaries get! Three guilty verdicts in separate federal trials and dismiss the felon-in-possession conviction to note the! Support browsers with JavaScript disabled and some functionality may be missing, follow. 'S Learn about the law some functionality may be missing, please follow these steps to enable it on! Federal court last week monitoring and assessing the impact of practices, policies and! Based upon the same conduct orders in case numbers 60CR-02-1695 and 60CR-02-1978 that! Only for the greater conviction by FindLaw Staff 60CR-02-1695 and 60CR-02-1978 provide Benson... *, and existing laws on the erroneous view that, pursuant to A. a. To you not reflect the most recent version of the evidence is not preserved for appeal terroristic. Double jeopardy issue may arise in conjunction with the terroristic act ( Class B felony ),!, 77 ( 1999 ) 10, 2021 to cause to assessing the impact practices. 313, 314 Ark because the charges are different the latest delivered directly to you supreme court in reversed... The terroristic act statute in another context get the latest delivered directly to you the double-jeopardy argument on merits! Visit FindLaw 's Learn about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes, visit FindLaw 's Learn the!
Untitled Entertainment Submissions, Articles T